JPM-Bericht zeigt, dass Anleger Bitcoin dem Gold vorziehen

Der JPM-Bericht zeigt, dass Investoren in letzter Zeit Bitcoin gegenüber Gold gewählt haben.

Der Preisanstieg von Bitcoins in letzter Zeit kann auf die Tatsache zurückgeführt werden, dass die Institutionen Bitcoin gegenüber Gold gewählt haben.

Ein hervorstechender Faktor für den Anstieg des Bitcoin-Preises im Oktober ist, dass die Menschen weniger Gold verwenden. Es besteht ein Kontrast zwischen der expansiven Reise von Crypto Comeback und der niedrigen Flugbahn von ETFs für Gold.
Ein hervorstechender Faktor für den Anstieg des Bitcoin-Preises im Oktober ist, dass die Menschen weniger Gold verwenden.

Der JPM-Bericht zeigt, dass Anleger Bitcoin gegenüber Gold bevorzugen.

Der JPM-Bericht zeigt, dass Investoren in letzter Zeit Bitcoin gegenüber Gold gewählt haben. Der Preisanstieg von Bitcoins in letzter Zeit kann auf die Tatsache zurückgeführt werden, dass die Institutionen Bitcoin gegenüber Gold gewählt haben.

VerwandtePosts
Vorhersage des Bitcoin-Preises: BTC wird bis 2021 voraussichtlich 20.000 $ erreichen
Bitcoin-Minenarbeiter tauschen Flussspitzen um über 200% aus
Den Zusammenhang zwischen Joe Biden und Bitcoin verstehen
Bitcoin-Preisprognose – BTC/USD strebt 16.000 $ zur Feier der US-Wahlergebnisse an
JPM-Bericht zeigt, dass Anleger Bitcoin gegenüber Gold wählen 1

Das Papier deutet darauf hin, dass Anleger, die sich früher auf Gold-ETFs konzentriert haben, nun stattdessen auf Bitcoin setzen. JP Morgan erwartet, dass Bitcoin weiterhin um das Zehnfache steigen wird, wenn es als das neue Gold angesehen wird.

In JPMs jüngstem Bericht über Bitcoin werden mehrere Faktoren aufgeführt, warum die digitale Währung in einem Monat ein Wachstum verzeichnet hat. Große Unternehmen beginnen, große Mengen von BTC zu kaufen, während die Entscheidung von PayPal, auf Krypto umzustellen, ebenfalls ein Faktor für den Erfolg von Bitcoin ist.

PayPal hat es den Menschen leicht gemacht, Krypto-Währung zu kaufen und zu verkaufen. Laut dem JPM-Papier, dem bahnbrechenden Digital Asset Manager Grayscale Bitcoin Trust, sind Wachstum und Bitcoins ein und dasselbe.

Grayscale sieht einen Anstieg der Bitcoin-Nachfrage, da sich neben jungen Privatanlegern auch institutionelle Investoren für Bitcoin entscheiden. Institutionelle Investoren, die auf Bitcoin drängen, reichen von Family Offices bis hin zu Vermögensverwaltern und sind der wichtigste Faktor, der die Münze vorantreibt.

Bitcoin Cash Hard Fork: cosa devi sapere

Bitcoin Cash è impostato per un aggiornamento della rete questo mese. Ecco cosa comporta l’aggiornamento e cosa significa per la comunità crittografica.

Bitcoin Cash è impostato per un aggiornamento della rete il 15 novembre 2020

Una versione BCHN dell’aggiornamento include un nuovo e non controverso sistema di mining.

Il team di sviluppo di Bitcoin ABC ha proposto un aggiornamento alternativo che reindirizza anche l’8% dei premi minerari.

La blockchain di Bitcoin Cash è destinata a subire un controverso aggiornamento della rete questo mese, che potrebbe dividere la moneta in due, e non per la prima volta .

L’aggiornamento proposto, almeno per la versione BCHN, introduce un nuovo algoritmo di mining ed è ampiamente accettato. Eppure i fautori della moneta, che è al quinto posto a livello globale, sono rimasti sorpresi quando il team di sviluppatori di Bitcoin ABC ha proposto un aggiornamento alternativo che ha aggiunto un ulteriore elemento che avrebbe deviato l’8% dei premi del blocco dai minatori di Bitcoin Cash.

Iscriviti adesso

La proposta del team ABC, denominata „Bitcoin ABC“, metterebbe i soldi nelle mani del proprio team di sviluppo. L’idea non è una novità; privacy coin Zcash ha un fondo simile da molti anni. Tuttavia, quelli della comunità di Bitcoin Cash lo vedevano come una presa di denaro e sentivano che andava contro l’etica decentralizzata della moneta.

„Deviare parte della ricompensa del blocco #BitcoinCash per pagare un singolo team di sviluppo è il sogno di un pianificatore centrale in stile sovietico che diventa realtà. Per favore, smettila „, ha detto Ver, in un tweet questo agosto.

Bitcoin, the programmable currency revolution: Discreet Log Contracts and their implications

Bitcoin’s DeFi Looks Promising – Crypto enthusiasts often have the preconceived notion that Bitcoin is unable to accommodate complex smart contracts. Although the programming language in which Bitcoin is encoded, the famous Script language, is quite rigid, it is simply wrong to claim that Bitcoin cannot serve more advanced needs of smart contracts.

One of the hottest and most anticipated means by the Bitcoin community is DLC’s (Discreet Log Contracts) . The idea was originally formulated through an academic dissertation in 2017 by cryptographer and Bitcoin Up researcher, Thaddeus Dryja. The second main contributor to the project and the software developer is Gert-Jaap Glasbergen. These two keyboard wizards work together at MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) under the digital currencies initiative . It is also at one of the events organized by this branch of MIT in 2018 which aimed to explore the second layer solutions that the two developers are presenting for the first time. their project.

The challenges of smart contracts

They first mention the challenges of implementing smart contracts in the financial sector, namely their scalability, as well as the difficulty in collecting external information from the financial market. Another big challenge with smart contracts published on a public network such as Bitcoin is confidentiality: it can indeed be very disadvantageous for two parties to make their financial bets visible.

The main idea of ​​a DLC is the creation of a monetary contract which specifies the distribution of funds between two parties in contingency with conditions specified a priori of the formation of the contract. The outcome necessary for the determination is controlled by an external entity independent of the contractors, either an Oracle or a combination of Oracle chosen by the parties.

The DLC has a structure similar to a 2 of 2 multi-signature contract . The funds can only be distributed following the publication of a valid signature by the oracle which then specifies the results in it through an API ( Application Programming Interface) . The publication time of this data is programmed in advance. To avoid collusion between the oracle and one of the potential contractual agents, the conditions of distribution of funds are not visible to the oracle.

Graphic representation of a DLC by the firm Crypto Garage

The fact remains, however, that the oracle constitutes the unique link between the blockchain and the real world, so it must necessarily be a legitimate and reliable source of information . In order to mitigate the risk of corruption of an oracle, parties may decide to use several oracles at the same time and calculate the average result. This risk mitigation is not yet possible, but is already under development.

The Evolution of DLCs – The “Signature Adapters”

The first major readjustment of the DLC project was the adaptation of their general structures to allow the use of “Signature Adapters” . This type of signature allows a scaled and more anonymous integration of DLCs than the type of signatures used previously. In short, “Adaptors signatures” allow the creation of two invalid signatures by contractors, only one of which could ultimately be validated in conjunction with the signature issued by Oracle. This allows one-sided resolution from a cryptographic point of view.

Obviously, the science and cryptography of “Adaptors signatures” goes far beyond the objective of this article, which is intended to be more general. For those who would like to know more, I invite you to consult these more detailed explanations made by Tari labs.